Human accountability
Problem framing, values, claims, final wording and publication decisions remain the author's responsibility.
Ethica should be testable in smaller parts, publicly criticised and changed before major power is moved. This portal is a prototype of how the open public-facing layer could work.
Arguments, assumptions, architecture, sources and objections should be reviewable.
Shared standards and interfaces do not require centralised data or centralised power.
The model must be able to show when it is wrong and contain paths to change or retire what does not work.
A new visitor should understand the problem, the idea and its limits without prior knowledge.
Someone who wants more depth should be able to follow the full argument without opening the main work.
Sources, versions, objections, architecture and code should be independently reviewable.
No hidden value choices, manipulative defaults or artificial urgency in democratic flows.
ethicademocracy.org
The domain is used for ETHICA's book, review and systems-specification portal. Trademark and rights questions are managed separately from the portal's technical publication.
Lars-Gunnar Johansson develops his ideas, texts and platforms with AI assistance for research structure, editing, translation, prototyping and code. Material is published only after human review and approval.
Problem framing, values, claims, final wording and publication decisions remain the author's responsibility.
AI may propose and synthesise, but it is not the author, decision-maker or independent verifier.
The author also develops AI-assisted platforms and cybersecurity ecosystems for clients in defence, finance and insurance, automotive, telecoms, energy and other industries.
S.W.Coach AB owns and operates the ethicademocracy.org website. Lars-Gunnar Johansson is the initiator and responsible editor of the ETHICA project.
Useful collaboration spans constitutional law, political science, public administration, economics, security engineering, assurance, AI governance, accessibility and service design.
The public launch should make criticism first-class: reproducible objections, alternative models and evidence that contradicts Ethica belong in the specification rather than outside it.