Constitution before optimisation
Rights, legality, independent courts, minority protection and human appeal routes establish the outer boundary.
ETHICA is not a single algorithm or institution. It is an architecture of limits, responsibility, evidence and democratic feedback. These are its strongest design rules.
No optimisation, majority or technical efficiency may become a shortcut around rights, rule of law or human accountability.
Rights, legality, independent courts, minority protection and human appeal routes establish the outer boundary.
Demographic data never changes vote weight. Representativeness may shape selection — never the worth of a citizen's will.
AI and experts may analyse, compare and explain. They may not decide what society must value or become sovereign authority.
Necessary access is stopped, evidence preserved, the case investigated, the person heard, a decision made and review allowed.
ETHICA treats agenda power, comparability and citizens' limited time as central democratic design problems.
Power lies in framing the problem, selecting alternatives and deciding what can be voted on. That power must be visible and contestable.
Citizens must not become unpaid full-time administrators. A few coordinated decision windows are preferable to constant referenda.
Official baseline data, analysis, ETHICA proposals, scenarios, simulations and open questions are clearly labelled.
A full model without a permanent parliament must be compared with reformed parliamentarism and hybrid models.
Promises must be traceable through funding, responsibility, implementation, cost, outcome and correction.
Alternatives disclose cost, expected outcome, uncertainty, risk, time horizon, rights impact and reassessment conditions.
The system preserves what was known, assumed and uncertain when a decision was made and compares it with what happened.
Success is not a won vote but whether the mandate was delivered, at what cost and with what verified result.
Deviations, failures and corrections remain versioned so the next decision starts from better knowledge.
Power, identity, vote content, money, evidence and control are separated so abuse requires multiple independent failures — and can be detected.
No component may simultaneously possess identity, vote content and prize outcome. Identity, voting, participation proof, selection and employment remain separate.
Two-person control, separated duties, expiring access and tamper-evident logs protect critical decisions and systems.
The successor structure has separate legal standing, keys, communications, registers, budget and shutdown authority.
Technical, legal and institutional reversibility are distinguished from real-world effects that cannot be undone.
Code, data, assumptions, mandates and outcomes are independently verifiable. Reviewers and metrics are reviewed too.
Digital coordination never eliminates phone, offices, paper, language and accessibility support or human appeal.
Constitution before optimisation. Evidence before certainty. Delivery before victory. Review before trust.